Comments on: No, REALLY http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/11/01/no-really/ I play the guitar, you know Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:16:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Dan http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/11/01/no-really/#comment-40439 Dan Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:27:56 +0000 http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/11/01/no-really/#comment-40439 Having been married to 2 goldiggers in the past and been dragged through the shite. :-D I hope her other fuckin' leg falls off! Having been married to 2 goldiggers in the past and been dragged through the shite.
:-D

I hope her other fuckin’ leg falls off!

]]> By: clive http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/11/01/no-really/#comment-40206 clive Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:11:15 +0000 http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/11/01/no-really/#comment-40206 Speaking as someone who has had a complaint upheld by the Press Complaints Commission, only to have the apology printed in 0.2pt text upside down somewhere under a staple, I whole-heartedly agree with that sentiment. I'm pretty sure it wasn't invented by FUCK OFF AND SHUT UP YOU'VE GOT FIFTY MILLION QUID NOW JUST FUCK OFF Heather Mills though. --c. Speaking as someone who has had a complaint upheld by the Press Complaints Commission, only to have the apology printed in 0.2pt text upside down somewhere under a staple, I whole-heartedly agree with that sentiment.

I’m pretty sure it wasn’t invented by FUCK OFF AND SHUT UP YOU’VE GOT FIFTY MILLION QUID NOW JUST FUCK OFF Heather Mills though.

–c.

]]> By: Jonah http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/11/01/no-really/#comment-40200 Jonah Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:40:21 +0000 http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/11/01/no-really/#comment-40200 Regardless of the merits of her case, she did come up with one suggestion that I thought was brilliant. A law stating that if a newspaper publishes lies about someone and is forced to retract/apologise, the retraction/apology must be given the same prominence in the newspaper as the offending article. I like that. What do you think? Regardless of the merits of her case, she did come up with one suggestion that I thought was brilliant. A law stating that if a newspaper publishes lies about someone and is forced to retract/apologise, the retraction/apology must be given the same prominence in the newspaper as the offending article.

I like that. What do you think?

]]>