<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No No No No No No NO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/07/10/no-no-no-no-no-no-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/07/10/no-no-no-no-no-no-no/</link>
	<description>I play the guitar, you know</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nige</title>
		<link>http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/07/10/no-no-no-no-no-no-no/#comment-27220</link>
		<dc:creator>Nige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/07/10/no-no-no-no-no-no-no/#comment-27220</guid>
		<description>While on the BBC News site, go here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6290302.stm and read from the 11th paragraph. You would think they would check their acronym before maning themselves. Imagine trying to find their web site ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While on the BBC News site, go here: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6290302.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6290302.stm</a> and read from the 11th paragraph. You would think they would check their acronym before maning themselves. Imagine trying to find their web site &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/07/10/no-no-no-no-no-no-no/#comment-27219</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/07/10/no-no-no-no-no-no-no/#comment-27219</guid>
		<description>Yeah, silly sods.

I'm sure I remember reading something (back when I was doing linguistics at Uni) that kids who are brought up bilingual tend to develop much better language and literacy skills. Which kind of makes a nonsense of the "simplified spelling" argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, silly sods.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I remember reading something (back when I was doing linguistics at Uni) that kids who are brought up bilingual tend to develop much better language and literacy skills. Which kind of makes a nonsense of the &#8220;simplified spelling&#8221; argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galetea</title>
		<link>http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/07/10/no-no-no-no-no-no-no/#comment-27160</link>
		<dc:creator>galetea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clivemurray.com/2007/07/10/no-no-no-no-no-no-no/#comment-27160</guid>
		<description>Speaking as someone for whom the spell check function in Word is a blessing, I STILL couldn't believe that anyone would advocate a "dumbing down" of spelling. I've spent to many damned years trying to get the hang of the word "phenomenon" to let some asshat tell me it's actually spelled "fennominon".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as someone for whom the spell check function in Word is a blessing, I STILL couldn&#8217;t believe that anyone would advocate a &#8220;dumbing down&#8221; of spelling. I&#8217;ve spent to many damned years trying to get the hang of the word &#8220;phenomenon&#8221; to let some asshat tell me it&#8217;s actually spelled &#8220;fennominon&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
